Victimization 受害这事 But mother was also—as was his father—a victim. The introjective process internalized that aspect of her pathology as well, so that Fred became in part a reflection of her own helpless and victimized self. These elements are recognizable in Fred's perceptions of and interactions with women. He saw them in part as powerful, destructive, controlling and castrating agents; to involve oneself with them was to be victimized and controlled, to have to submit to their demands and be ruled by their whims—sexual and otherwise. But at the same time he saw them as defective, damaged, weak, and helplessly victimized creatures. On this side of his projections, he felt himself to be a monster who hurt and damaged the women who became closely involved with him. These elements were readily available for projective elaboration. These severely pathogenic introjects were likewise the basis for his sense of inner evil and worthlessness. Their fragility and fragmented propensity for regression left him with an impaired and fragmented sense of autonomy. 但是，母亲，就像父亲一样，也是受害者。内摄过程也将她这种病态的方面内化了，因此弗雷德在某种程度上成了她自己无助的、受害的自体的一种反映。弗雷德对女性的看法以及与女性的互动中都可以识别出这些元素。他在某种程度上把她们看作是强大的、破坏性的、有控制欲的和阉割的力量；与她们交往就意味着成为受害者并受到控制，不得不屈服于她们的要求并被她们的性冲动和其他冲动所支配。但与此同时，他又把她们看作是有缺陷的、受损的、软弱的、无助的受害生物。在他投射的这一面，他觉得自己是一个怪物，伤害了与他关系密切的女性。这些元素很容易进行投射性阐述。这些具有严重致病性的内摄物同样是他内心邪恶感和无价值感的基础。它们的脆弱性和分裂性的退行倾向使他留下了一种受损和分裂的自主感。 From one point of view, the introjection of these respective parental imagos had its implications for the organization of Fred's perception of himself and for the functioning of his personality. The structure of his rather fragmented self was organized around the respective introjects of both father and mother. We have pointed out the aspect of victimization which derived from both parents. There was also the aspect of destructive omnipotence. Both these elements were combined in Fred's inner psychic economy and structure and provided a focus for his pathology. Equally important, however, was the dimension of blaming and the shifting of responsibility that was evident in both parents. Each parent in subtle and not so subtle ways implicitly blamed Fred for a part of their own unhappiness and frustration. He became the victim, through blaming, of their respective inadequacy and failure. But in addition, the interaction between his father and mother was based on mutual blaming and accusation. Their relationship was mutually undercutting and destructive, and the predominant style of this mutually devastating interaction was one of blame and assignment of responsibility. Besides the dimensions of structural defect involved in the introjections of these pathological elements, there was built into Fred's functioning personality a style of defensiveness, a style which was based in part on the patterns of action and expression derived from these introjects, but also based in part on the assimilation and internalization of the patterns of interaction that constituted the family relationships. 从某种角度来看，这些各自的父母意象的内摄对弗雷德自我感知的组织和他的人格功能产生了影响。他相当分裂的自体结构是围绕父母各自的内摄物组织的。我们已经指出了来自父母的受害方面。还有破坏性的全能方面。这两个元素都结合在弗雷德内心的心理经济和结构中，并为他的病理学提供了一个焦点。然而，同样重要的是，在父母双方身上都明显存在的责备和转移责任的维度。每一位父母都以微妙和不太微妙的方式含蓄地责备弗雷德，认为他是他们部分不幸和挫折的根源。他通过责备成为了他们各自不足和失败的受害者。但除此之外，他父亲和母亲之间的互动是基于相互责备和指责的。他们的关系是相互削弱和破坏性的，而这种相互破坏性的互动的主要方式就是责备和分配责任。除了这些病理元素内摄所涉及的结构缺陷的维度外，弗雷德的功能性人格中还建立了一种防御风格，这种风格部分基于这些内摄物所产生的行动和表达模式，但也部分基于构成家庭关系的互动模式的同化和内化。