The Paranoid Influence 偏执的影响 We should not overlook in our consideration of Henry's pathology, the tremendous influence of his father. It was not merely the introjection of the aggressive father-image that contributed to his paranoia, but it seemed also that the father himself was severely paranoid, quite possibly psychotically paranoid. We have no way to document this influence, but we know that in other instances the paranoia of one or the other parent can come to dominate the unconscious as well as conscious attitudes within the family. The family constellation here of a paranoid father and a masochistically depressed mother has become quite familiar in the study of these cases, particularly in families with paranoid sons. 在考虑亨利的病理时，我们不应忽视他父亲对他的巨大影响。不仅仅是他对具有攻击性的父亲形象的内摄导致了他的偏执，而且似乎他的父亲本人也极度偏执，甚至很可能是精神病水平的偏执。我们无法用文件证明这种影响，但我们知道，在其他情况下，父母中一方的偏执可能会主导家庭中的无意识和有意识态度。在这类案例的研究中，尤其是对于有偏执儿子的家庭来说，一个偏执的父亲和一个受虐性抑郁的母亲这种家庭结构已经变得相当熟悉。 Henry's paranoia, therefore, was very likely a product of both pathological internalizations derived from both parents and learned attitudes and styles of thinking derived particularly from his father. The paranoia established a place for him, as well as a form of identity by which he could situate himself in relation to his family and others around him. Henry's position as the helpless victim and martyr established a pattern of relationships which defined a community to which he belonged and within which he had a certain role to play and certain functions to serve. Within this complex of pathological relatedness, it also provided him with a sense of identity which he otherwise lacked. This identity, however, was a pathological creation, a pseudoidentity that sustained its life by its continued involvement in the pathological interaction within the family system. In Henry's case, as in so many others, the internalization of the paternal and maternal introjects as component parts of the family interaction system formed the internal core of the paranoid pathology. The external drama of the family system is thus reenacted in the inner stage of the patient's psyche, and in the moments of frankly paranoid projection is rehearsed once more on the external stage of interpersonal relations. 因此，亨利的偏执很可能是从父母双方那里内化的病理产物，以及特别是从父亲那里习得的态度和思维方式共同作用的结果。偏执为他确立了一个位置，以及一种身份认同，使他能够据此确定自己在家庭及周围人中的位置。亨利作为无助的受害者和殉道者的地位，建立了一种关系模式，界定了他所属的群体，以及他在其中要扮演的特定角色和要发挥的特定功能。在这种病态关系的复杂体系中，它也为他提供了一种否则他所缺乏的身份认同感。然而，这种身份是一种病态的创造，是一种伪身份，它通过与家庭系统内的病态互动持续纠缠来维持其存在。在亨利案例中，就像在许多其他案例中一样，父性和母性内摄物作为家庭互动系统的组成部分被内化，构成了偏执病理的内部核心。家庭系统的外部戏剧因而在患者心灵的内在舞台上重新上演，而在明确偏执的投射时刻，则再次在人际关系的外部舞台上排练。