Introjective Interaction 内摄性互动 If we bring into focus at this point the introjective configuration that is identifiable in Karen's intrapsychic world, we can begin to see that it offers certain specific resemblances to the introjective pattern that we have become familiar with in the study of the paranoid process. To put it in terms of the Oedipal configuration, we can think in terms of the positive and the negative Oedipal situations. For Karen, it is the positive Oedipal relationship which lies closest to the surface. In these terms, she adores and idealizes her father, and hates and reviles and struggles against her mother. In these terms, she identifies with the strong aggressive controlling aspect of her father and tries to set a distance between her and mother. 在这一点上，如果我们把注意力集中在可以在卡伦的内心理世界中辨认出来的内摄结构上，我们可以开始看到它与我们在研究偏执过程中已经熟悉的内摄模式有特定的相似性。从俄狄浦斯情结的角度来看，我们可以从正面和负面的俄狄浦斯情结来思考。对卡伦来说，最接近表面的是积极的俄狄浦斯情结。在这些方面，她崇拜和理想化她的父亲，憎恨，辱骂和斗争她的母亲。在这些方面，她认同父亲的强势控制欲，并试图在她和母亲之间建立一种距离。 But it is not this aspect of her intrapsychic economy which lies at the root of the difficulty. At a deeper level there is the negative Oedipal complex. At this level, Karen yearns for and constantly seeks approval and acceptance and closeness with her mother, while she rejects her father's authoritarian control and feels contempt for his pathetic insecurity and weakness. It is in these terms that Karen identifies with the vulnerable and victimized woman-mother and internalizes her mother's critical, accusatory, and punitive attitudes. This is also the source of her contempt for male inadequacy and dependency and her contemptuous hostility for the "puppydog." 但问题的根源并不在于她内在的心理经济。在更深的层次上是负面的俄狄浦斯情结。在这个层次上，卡伦渴望并不断寻求母亲的认同、接纳和亲近，而她拒绝父亲的独裁控制，对父亲可怜的不安全感和软弱感到轻蔑。正是在这些条件下，卡伦认同了脆弱和受害的女性母亲，并内化了她母亲的批评、指责和惩罚态度。这也是她蔑视男性的不足和依赖，蔑视“小狗”的敌意的根源。 What is impressive here—although by no means new—is the fact that the Oedipal involvement itself is less meaningful than the introjective prehistory which provides the substance out of which the Oedipal configuration is evolved. It is the patterning of these introjects, developed through the preoedipal developmental history and carrying with them pregenital determinants—in this case, and in many of the cases of paranoid manifestations, specifically the anal determinants—that gives shape to and determines the quality and the emphasis within the Oedipal configurations. 这里令人印象深刻的是——尽管绝不是新的——俄狄浦斯情结本身没有内摄的史前史那么有意义，而内摄的史前史为俄狄浦斯情结的形成提供了物质基础。这些内摄的模式,通过前俄狄浦斯发展历史，带着前性器期的决定因素——在这种案例,以及在许多偏执表现，特别是肛门决定因素的案例中——塑造和决定俄狄浦斯情结配置的质量和重点。 Part of the problem in dealing with Karen's pathology is that there is a certain splitting between these introjective organizations with a resulting alternation between one configuration and another. The splitting and the sequential emphasis and adoption of introjective positions serves rather intense defensive needs. Thus, for Karen, the adoption of the strong, controlling, coping, aggressive, mastering position, which reflects so directly her introjection of the more adequate aspects of her father's personality, serves as an important and indeed essential defense against the sense of weakness and vulnerability and victimized martyrhood which is involved in the maternal introject. Conversely, the adoption of the alternative position, that of susceptible, vulnerable and dependent female, serves important defensive needs in avoiding and protecting Karen from the intensity of destructive and hostile impulses involved in the introjection of the aggressor. 处理卡伦的病理的部分问题是，这些内摄组织之间存在一定的分裂，导致一种结构和另一种结构的交替。分裂和顺序的强调以及采用内摄心位，都是为了满足强烈的防御需要。因此,卡伦,采用强烈的,控制的,应对性的,咄咄逼人的,掌握的位置,这直接反映了她对父亲个性更胜任方面的内摄,这是对母亲内摄带来的软弱、脆弱的感觉，以及受害的烈士感的防御。相反，采取另一种立场，即易受伤害、脆弱和依赖的女性，是服务于这样的防御需要——避免和保护卡伦不受侵略者的内摄所引起的破坏性和敌对冲动的强烈影响。 It is important to note there that the alternative introjective positions cannot simply be identified on any one-to-one basis with the respective parental figures. Rather, the complex introjective alignment is a result of the interplay and the interaction of introjective elements derived from both parents. Consequently, if we were to denominate one aspect of Karen's introjective economy in terms of identification with the aggressor, we would have to make reference to introjective elements derived from both parental figures involving, for example, father's authoritarian and mysteriously destructive aspects, as well as mother's punitive and harsh accusatory superego stance. Alternatively, if we focus on the victimized aspect of Karen's introjective alignment, we would similarly have to make reference not only to the pose of victimized and martyred femininity represented by the figure of the mother, but would also have to add to that the sense of inadequacy and vulnerability and pathetic susceptibility which Karen unquestionably could detect under her father's bluster and military facade, and which became quite apparent after his retirement from the Army and the onset of insecurities in connection with his job and the erosions of time and age. 重要的是要注意到，其他的内摄位置不能简单地在任何一对一的基础上与各自的父母角色认同。相反，复杂的内摄对齐是来自双亲的内摄元素相互作用的结果。因此,如果我们要用侵略者认同命名卡伦内摄经济的一个方面，我们将不得不提到来源于父母形象的内摄元素，包括,例如,父亲的专制,神秘的破坏性的方面,以及母亲的惩罚性和严厉的指责的超我的立场。或者,如果我们关注卡伦的内摄对齐的受害者方面,我们同样不得不提到母亲形象所代表的受害和烈士女性姿态,但也必须加上不胜任感、脆弱感和可怜的易受影响感，这些是卡伦毫无疑问可从她父亲的咆哮和军人一面之下察觉到的，这在他从军队退役，不安全感出现后，变得很明显。这种不安全感与他的工作，还有时间与年龄的逝去有关。