Projective Elements 投射元素 Another important dimension that we need to remind ourselves of in reference to the introjective vicissitudes is that these provide the fundament and the substance on the basis of which projective mechanisms function. In her pathological alternation between these introjective components, Karen inevitably would repress the alternate aspect of the introjective alignment. The repressed aspect of the introjective organization would become the substance of the projection. Consequently, when the introjective alignment was dominated by the aspects of victimization, the aggressive components were projected into the external objects. This projection took place in the analysis, whereby I became the insensitive brute whose only objective was to submit her to analytic categories and to make her dependent and vulnerable and susceptible to my interpretations. 在谈到内摄的变迁时，我们需要提醒自己的另一个重要的方面是，在这些东西提供的基础和实质上，投射机制发挥作用。在这些内摄成分的病态交替中，卡伦不可避免地会抑制内摄对齐的另一个方面。内摄组织的压抑方面将成为投射的实质。因此，当内摄对齐被受害方面控制时，攻击性成分被投射到外部对象中。这种投射发生在分析中，我变成了一个麻木不仁的畜生，唯一的目的就是让她服从分析范畴，让她依赖我，变得脆弱，容易受到我的解释的影响。 The projection, however, also played itself out in much broader perspectives. In these terms, Karen was easily capable of painting the entire society and culture in which she lived in terms which cast it in the role of the brutal and insensitive, fascist agent of the suppression and debasement of women, and particularly a force which victimized and took advantage of Karen herself, depriving her of her sense of uniqueness and individuality and the specialness that formed such an important support for her inner security. 然而，投射也从更广泛的角度发挥了作用。用这些术语,卡伦很容易将她生活在其中的整个社会和文化描绘成这个样子，残酷和麻木不仁的角色,抑制和贬值女性的法西斯代理,尤其是一个迫害和利用卡伦的力量,剥夺了她的独特性和个性和特殊性,这些东西是她内心安全感的重要支撑。 Similarly, when the strong, resourceful, coping and more aggressive aspects dominated the introjective economy, it was the victim aspect that became the basis for projection. Thus, within the analysis, her defensively derived need to counterattack and to undermine my methodology and challenge my analytic competence ran the risk of hurting and defeating me. It was this aspect of her projective effort which made me into a potential "puppydog" and which consequently cast upon her the burden of destructiveness and hurtfulness. It was this burden that inevitably called forth the unavoidable chastisement of guilt. 同样，当强大、足智多谋、应对能力强和更具侵略性的方面主导着投射经济时，受害者方面成为投射的基础。因此，在分析中，她防御性地产生的反击和破坏我方法论，挑战我分析能力的需要，冒着伤害和击败我的风险。正是她这种投射的努力的这个方面，使我变成了一个潜在的“小狗”，并因此给她带来了破坏性和伤害的负担。正是这种负担不可避免地引起了对罪恶不可避免的惩罚。 But she carried the same mechanism into her relationship with other men as well. The alternatives were clearly structured and stated: if a man was not relating to her as an insensitive brute, if he showed any weakness or insecurity or even loving dependence on her, this served only to elicit her contempt and her aggressive wish to put him down and treat him as a "puppydog." This too found its larger ramification and rationalization onthe broad canvas of the outer world. She decried the social processes and mechanisms by which men were required to remain their mother's little boys, and thus became inadequate and too weak and insecure to deal with a strong-minded, intelligent, and professional woman such as herself. Thus, for Karen men were seen dichotomously as either strong, powerful, destructive, callous, insensitive brutes who victimized and took advantage of women, demeaning and subjugating them sexually and socially and intellectually; or they were weak, insecure, inadequate, impotent, and pathetically vulnerable creatures who could be destroyed by any woman who did not place herself in a demeaned, nonthreatening, and subjugated role. One of the very central and important aspects of the analytic process was the definition and testing out and working through of these introjective-projective complexes and a gradual erosion of the dichotomous logic which dictated that the universe had to be divided between these extreme polarities. The logic, of course, was derived from and expressed the dichotomized organization of Karen's internal world. The work of analysis was directed to the modification and erosion of that internal polarization. 但她在与其他男人的关系中也运用了同样的机制。这些交替显然清晰地组织和表述为：如果一个跟她建立关系的男人，不是一个麻木不仁的畜生,如果他表现出弱点和不安全感,甚至爱依赖她，这只会引起她的蔑视和她的攻击性愿望，即把他打倒，把他当作“小狗”。这在外部世界的广阔范围内也发现了其更大的后果和合理化。她谴责社会的进程和机制，通过这些进程和机制，男人被要求保持做他们母亲的小男孩，因此变得不胜任，太弱，没有安全感，以至于无法应付一个坚强的，聪明的，专业的女人，比如她自己。因此，对卡伦来说，男人被分为两种，要么强壮、强大、具有破坏性、冷酷无情、麻木不仁的野兽，他们迫害和利用女性，在性、社会和智力上贬低和征服她们;要么软弱、没有安全感的、不称职、无能的、可怜的、可怜脆弱的生物，任何一个女人只要不把自己置于一个被贬低的、没有威胁的、被征服的角色，就能把他们毁灭。分析过程的一个非常核心和重要的方面是对这些内摄-投射复合体的定义、检验和工作，以及对二元论逻辑的逐渐侵蚀，二元论逻辑规定宇宙必须在这些极端极性之间划分。当然，这种逻辑是从卡伦的内部世界的二元结构中衍生出来并表达出来的。分析的工作是针对内部极化的修正和侵蚀。