Homosexuality 同性恋 It might be well to add a comment here about the question of homosexuality in relation to Don's pathology. Homosexuality was never an explicit problem, nor was it ever a focus of concern in psychotherapy. Don had never experienced homosexual wishes of any significant intensity and he had never had any homosexual experiences. He explicitly felt anxiety about his ability to relate to women—and particularly about his ability to satisfy them sexually. We can postulate a defensive element in this against underlying homosexual fears and doubts. But this anxiety was not cast in terms of homosexuality as such. The issue was much more in the line of what Ovesey (1954, 1955a, 1955b) has described in terms of pseudohomosexual conflicts. His concerns over his ability to "make it" with girls were much more in the line of proving to himself and his family—but primarily to himself—that he could function adequately in the business of being an independent and capable adult. The issue of independence and autonomous functioning, then, was compounded with homosexual anxiety, but not expressed explicitly as such a conflict. Both aspects of this complex conflict were rooted in his feminine identification, based on the introjection of the maternal image. 在这里，我们有必要将同性恋问题与唐的病理联系起来做一个评论。同性恋从来都不是一个明确的问题，也从来都不是心理治疗关注的焦点。唐从未经历过任何强烈的同性恋愿望，他也从未有过任何同性恋经历。他明显对自己与女性相处的能力，尤其是对自己从性上满足女性的能力 感到焦虑。我们可以假设这是一种防御因素，用来对抗潜在的同性恋恐惧和怀疑。但这种焦虑并不是针对同性恋本身。这个问题更符合Ovesey (1954, 1955a, 1955b)所描述的伪同性恋冲突。他对自己与女孩相处能力的担忧更多是为了向他自己和家人证明——但主要是向他自己证明——他能够胜任工作，成为一个独立而有能力的成年人。因此，独立和自主功能的问题与同性恋焦虑交织在一起，但没有明确地表达为这样的冲突。这两方面的复杂冲突都植根于他 基于母亲形象内摄 的女性认同。